Wrong LHFL_S calculation in the case of sublimation – in #9: CCLM
in #9: CCLM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Hi Stefan,
</p>
<p>
sounds, at a first quick glance, reasonable, especially if one realizes that the case of “frozen lakes” had already been
<br/>
taken into account in slow_tendencies.f90, but not in src_slow_tendencies_rk.f90.
</p>
<p>
Did you already perform calculations with the changed version and check how large the effect on the
<br/>
results for latent heat fluxes for “frozen” conditions is?
<br/>
Did you discuss it already with the responsible persons at
<span class="caps">
DWD
</span>
?
</p>
<p>
Hans-Jürgen
</p>
<p>
Hi Stefan,
</p>
<p>
sounds, at a first quick glance, reasonable, especially if one realizes that the case of “frozen lakes” had already been
<br/>
taken into account in slow_tendencies.f90, but not in src_slow_tendencies_rk.f90.
</p>
<p>
Did you already perform calculations with the changed version and check how large the effect on the
<br/>
results for latent heat fluxes for “frozen” conditions is?
<br/>
Did you discuss it already with the responsible persons at
<span class="caps">
DWD
</span>
?
</p>
<p>
Hans-Jürgen
</p>
sounds, at a first quick glance, reasonable, especially if one realizes that the case of “frozen lakes” had already been
taken into account in slow_tendencies.f90, but not in src_slow_tendencies_rk.f90.
Did you already perform calculations with the changed version and check how large the effect on the
results for latent heat fluxes for “frozen” conditions is?
Did you discuss it already with the responsible persons at
DWD
?
Hi Stefan,
sounds, at a first quick glance, reasonable, especially if one realizes that the case of “frozen lakes” had already been
taken into account in slow_tendencies.f90, but not in src_slow_tendencies_rk.f90.
Did you already perform calculations with the changed version and check how large the effect on the
results for latent heat fluxes for “frozen” conditions is?
Did you discuss it already with the responsible persons at DWD ?
Hans-Jürgen