Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
I guess that there are some unrealistic values in the files
<br/>
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
<span class="caps">
ESM
</span>
-LR/historical/year1987/caf1987080318.nc
<br/>
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
<span class="caps">
ESM
</span>
-LR/historical/year1989/caf1989081612.nc
<br/>
However, several colleagues from the
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
-Community already used the data without any problem.
<br/>
Have you checked the data files by using
<code>
ncview
</code>
or/and
<code>
cdo info
</code>
or/and setting the
<code>
idbg_level
</code>
in the namelist to a high value (which gives more information in the log file. It is better to run int2lm for the idbg_level test with
<code>
nprocx = 1, nprocy = 1
</code>
for the test to get a cleaner logfile)?
</p>
<p>
I guess that there are some unrealistic values in the files
<br/>
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
<span class="caps">
ESM
</span>
-LR/historical/year1987/caf1987080318.nc
<br/>
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
<span class="caps">
ESM
</span>
-LR/historical/year1989/caf1989081612.nc
<br/>
However, several colleagues from the
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
-Community already used the data without any problem.
<br/>
Have you checked the data files by using
<code>
ncview
</code>
or/and
<code>
cdo info
</code>
or/and setting the
<code>
idbg_level
</code>
in the namelist to a high value (which gives more information in the log file. It is better to run int2lm for the idbg_level test with
<code>
nprocx = 1, nprocy = 1
</code>
for the test to get a cleaner logfile)?
</p>
I guess that there are some unrealistic values in the files
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
ESM
-LR/historical/year1987/caf1987080318.nc
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI-
ESM
-LR/historical/year1989/caf1989081612.nc
However, several colleagues from the
CLM
-Community already used the data without any problem.
Have you checked the data files by using
ncview
or/and
cdo info
or/and setting the
idbg_level
in the namelist to a high value (which gives more information in the log file. It is better to run int2lm for the idbg_level test with
nprocx = 1, nprocy = 1
for the test to get a cleaner logfile)?
I guess that there are some unrealistic values in the files
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI- ESM -LR/historical/year1987/caf1987080318.nc
/SCRATCH/acad/cclm/MPI- ESM -LR/historical/year1989/caf1989081612.nc
However, several colleagues from the CLM -Community already used the data without any problem.
Have you checked the data files by using
ncviewor/andcdo infoor/and setting theidbg_levelin the namelist to a high value (which gives more information in the log file. It is better to run int2lm for the idbg_level test withnprocx = 1, nprocy = 1for the test to get a cleaner logfile)?