Convert ERA-INTERIM pressure level(37levels) data to hybrid coordinate – in #10: INT2LM
in #10: INT2LM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Dear
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
community members,
</p>
<p>
I am Lee Donghyun at
<span class="caps">
POSTECH
</span>
, South Korea, and our team are involved in
<span class="caps">
CORDEX
</span>
East
<span class="caps">
ASIA
</span>
Phase 2 Project.
<br/>
Under this project, not only our team but also other teams are involved in,
<br/>
we use same background forcing data for simulating with different
<span class="caps">
RCM
</span>
s (
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
, RegCM,
<span class="caps">
WRF
</span>
, MM5).
<br/>
This year, our shared data is
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
with around 0.70 resolution (n128 gausian grid).
</p>
<p>
Here is the problem, since the shared data has pressure vertical coordinate(37 levels),
<br/>
I need to convert this level datas to hybrid coordiante appropriately before run INT2LM.
</p>
<p>
In order to find ak/bk for 38 levels,
<br/>
I follow the exact same numbers from
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
report (attached file 1, page 8 to 9),
<br/>
but I do not sure this convertion is right without any pre-vertical integration between 37 pressure levels to matched 37 model levels.
<br/>
(Example, 1000hPa in pressure level, but matched level in model hybrid level is 998.39, with ak and bk. Do I interpolate 1000hPa data to 998.39, before runs INT2LM? )
</p>
<p>
After giving ak/bk values,
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
files are working in INT2LM.
<br/>
So, what I still wonder is did I make the right ak/bk value for pressure level data conversion.
<br/>
(attached file 2, cdl file which I used in ncgen for applying ak/bk values)
</p>
<p>
Thank you for your attention.
</p>
<p>
Best wishes,
<br/>
Lee Donghyun
</p>
<p>
Dear
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
community members,
</p>
<p>
I am Lee Donghyun at
<span class="caps">
POSTECH
</span>
, South Korea, and our team are involved in
<span class="caps">
CORDEX
</span>
East
<span class="caps">
ASIA
</span>
Phase 2 Project.
<br/>
Under this project, not only our team but also other teams are involved in,
<br/>
we use same background forcing data for simulating with different
<span class="caps">
RCM
</span>
s (
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
, RegCM,
<span class="caps">
WRF
</span>
, MM5).
<br/>
This year, our shared data is
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
with around 0.70 resolution (n128 gausian grid).
</p>
<p>
Here is the problem, since the shared data has pressure vertical coordinate(37 levels),
<br/>
I need to convert this level datas to hybrid coordiante appropriately before run INT2LM.
</p>
<p>
In order to find ak/bk for 38 levels,
<br/>
I follow the exact same numbers from
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
report (attached file 1, page 8 to 9),
<br/>
but I do not sure this convertion is right without any pre-vertical integration between 37 pressure levels to matched 37 model levels.
<br/>
(Example, 1000hPa in pressure level, but matched level in model hybrid level is 998.39, with ak and bk. Do I interpolate 1000hPa data to 998.39, before runs INT2LM? )
</p>
<p>
After giving ak/bk values,
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-
<span class="caps">
INTERIM
</span>
files are working in INT2LM.
<br/>
So, what I still wonder is did I make the right ak/bk value for pressure level data conversion.
<br/>
(attached file 2, cdl file which I used in ncgen for applying ak/bk values)
</p>
<p>
Thank you for your attention.
</p>
<p>
Best wishes,
<br/>
Lee Donghyun
</p>
Convert ERA-INTERIM pressure level(37levels) data to hybrid coordinate
I am Lee Donghyun at
POSTECH
, South Korea, and our team are involved in
CORDEX
East
ASIA
Phase 2 Project.
Under this project, not only our team but also other teams are involved in,
we use same background forcing data for simulating with different
RCM
s (
CLM
, RegCM,
WRF
, MM5).
This year, our shared data is
ERA
-
INTERIM
with around 0.70 resolution (n128 gausian grid).
Here is the problem, since the shared data has pressure vertical coordinate(37 levels),
I need to convert this level datas to hybrid coordiante appropriately before run INT2LM.
In order to find ak/bk for 38 levels,
I follow the exact same numbers from
ERA
-
INTERIM
report (attached file 1, page 8 to 9),
but I do not sure this convertion is right without any pre-vertical integration between 37 pressure levels to matched 37 model levels.
(Example, 1000hPa in pressure level, but matched level in model hybrid level is 998.39, with ak and bk. Do I interpolate 1000hPa data to 998.39, before runs INT2LM? )
After giving ak/bk values,
ERA
-
INTERIM
files are working in INT2LM.
So, what I still wonder is did I make the right ak/bk value for pressure level data conversion.
(attached file 2, cdl file which I used in ncgen for applying ak/bk values)
<p>
Dear Donghyun,
</p>
<p>
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-Interim reanalyses are already pre-processed into a format that we call “INT2LM-ready”.
<br/>
That means that you can use these data as input for INT2LM.
<br/>
The data are available for
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
-Community members as NetCDF 4 compressed files from the computing system “
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
” at
<span class="caps">
DKRZ
</span>
in Hamburg.
<br/>
If you have an account on that system try to go to
</p>
<p>
/pool/data/CCLM/reanalyses/ERAInterim
</p>
<p>
From there you can copy the data to your system by using “scp”.
<br/>
Please, read the “
<span class="caps">
README
</span>
” file, it contains important information.
</p>
<p>
If you don’t have an account on “
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
”, please contact Burkhardt Rockel, E-Mail: burkhardt.rockel@hzg.de
</p>
<p>
Best regards
</p>
<p>
Hans-Juergen
</p>
<p>
Dear Donghyun,
</p>
<p>
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-Interim reanalyses are already pre-processed into a format that we call “INT2LM-ready”.
<br/>
That means that you can use these data as input for INT2LM.
<br/>
The data are available for
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
-Community members as NetCDF 4 compressed files from the computing system “
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
” at
<span class="caps">
DKRZ
</span>
in Hamburg.
<br/>
If you have an account on that system try to go to
</p>
<p>
/pool/data/CCLM/reanalyses/ERAInterim
</p>
<p>
From there you can copy the data to your system by using “scp”.
<br/>
Please, read the “
<span class="caps">
README
</span>
” file, it contains important information.
</p>
<p>
If you don’t have an account on “
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
”, please contact Burkhardt Rockel, E-Mail: burkhardt.rockel@hzg.de
</p>
<p>
Best regards
</p>
<p>
Hans-Juergen
</p>
ERA
-Interim reanalyses are already pre-processed into a format that we call “INT2LM-ready”.
That means that you can use these data as input for INT2LM.
The data are available for
CLM
-Community members as NetCDF 4 compressed files from the computing system “
BLIZZARD
” at
DKRZ
in Hamburg.
If you have an account on that system try to go to
/pool/data/CCLM/reanalyses/ERAInterim
From there you can copy the data to your system by using “scp”.
Please, read the “
README
” file, it contains important information.
If you don’t have an account on “
BLIZZARD
”, please contact Burkhardt Rockel, E-Mail: burkhardt.rockel@hzg.de
<p>
Dear Hans-Juergen,
</p>
<p>
Thank you for advice, I will make an account on :BLIZZARD as soon as possible.
</p>
<p>
This year we plan to use
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
, so it would be fine if the
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
data is equal to shared
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
among
<span class="caps">
CORDEX
</span>
EA team.
<br/>
However, for next year, we plan to use
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
which is less likely to exist on
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
server.
</p>
<p>
Since our East
<span class="caps">
ASIA
</span>
project team have agreement that use same shared
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
data for simulation in different
<span class="caps">
RCM
</span>
s, I hope that I can convert shared
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
appropriately for
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
simulation.
</p>
<p>
Best reagrds
<br/>
Lee Donghyun
</p>
<p>
Dear Hans-Juergen,
</p>
<p>
Thank you for advice, I will make an account on :BLIZZARD as soon as possible.
</p>
<p>
This year we plan to use
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
, so it would be fine if the
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
data is equal to shared
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
among
<span class="caps">
CORDEX
</span>
EA team.
<br/>
However, for next year, we plan to use
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
which is less likely to exist on
<span class="caps">
BLIZZARD
</span>
server.
</p>
<p>
Since our East
<span class="caps">
ASIA
</span>
project team have agreement that use same shared
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
data for simulation in different
<span class="caps">
RCM
</span>
s, I hope that I can convert shared
<span class="caps">
GCM
</span>
appropriately for
<span class="caps">
CLM
</span>
simulation.
</p>
<p>
Best reagrds
<br/>
Lee Donghyun
</p>
Thank you for advice, I will make an account on :BLIZZARD as soon as possible.
This year we plan to use
ERA
, so it would be fine if the
BLIZZARD
ERA
data is equal to shared
ERA
among
CORDEX
EA team.
However, for next year, we plan to use
GCM
which is less likely to exist on
BLIZZARD
server.
Since our East
ASIA
project team have agreement that use same shared
GCM
data for simulation in different
RCM
s, I hope that I can convert shared
GCM
appropriately for
CLM
simulation.
<p>
Dear Dong Hyun,
</p>
<p>
would you please send me your e-Mail address.
<br/>
I tried
donghyunlee@postech.ac.kr
</p>
<p>
but it failed.
</p>
<p>
my E-Mail: hans-juergen.panitz@kit.edu
</p>
<p>
Hans-Juergen
</p>
<p>
Dear Dong Hyun,
</p>
<p>
would you please send me your e-Mail address.
<br/>
I tried
donghyunlee@postech.ac.kr
</p>
<p>
but it failed.
</p>
<p>
my E-Mail: hans-juergen.panitz@kit.edu
</p>
<p>
Hans-Juergen
</p>
Convert ERA-INTERIM pressure level(37levels) data to hybrid coordinate
Dear CLM community members,
I am Lee Donghyun at POSTECH , South Korea, and our team are involved in CORDEX East ASIA Phase 2 Project.
Under this project, not only our team but also other teams are involved in,
we use same background forcing data for simulating with different RCM s ( CLM , RegCM, WRF , MM5).
This year, our shared data is ERA - INTERIM with around 0.70 resolution (n128 gausian grid).
Here is the problem, since the shared data has pressure vertical coordinate(37 levels),
I need to convert this level datas to hybrid coordiante appropriately before run INT2LM.
In order to find ak/bk for 38 levels,
I follow the exact same numbers from ERA - INTERIM report (attached file 1, page 8 to 9),
but I do not sure this convertion is right without any pre-vertical integration between 37 pressure levels to matched 37 model levels.
(Example, 1000hPa in pressure level, but matched level in model hybrid level is 998.39, with ak and bk. Do I interpolate 1000hPa data to 998.39, before runs INT2LM? )
After giving ak/bk values, ERA - INTERIM files are working in INT2LM.
So, what I still wonder is did I make the right ak/bk value for pressure level data conversion.
(attached file 2, cdl file which I used in ncgen for applying ak/bk values)
Thank you for your attention.
Best wishes,
Lee Donghyun
Dear Donghyun,
ERA -Interim reanalyses are already pre-processed into a format that we call “INT2LM-ready”.
That means that you can use these data as input for INT2LM.
The data are available for CLM -Community members as NetCDF 4 compressed files from the computing system “ BLIZZARD ” at DKRZ in Hamburg.
If you have an account on that system try to go to
/pool/data/CCLM/reanalyses/ERAInterim
From there you can copy the data to your system by using “scp”.
Please, read the “ README ” file, it contains important information.
If you don’t have an account on “ BLIZZARD ”, please contact Burkhardt Rockel, E-Mail: burkhardt.rockel@hzg.de
Best regards
Hans-Juergen
Dear Hans-Juergen,
Thank you for advice, I will make an account on :BLIZZARD as soon as possible.
This year we plan to use ERA , so it would be fine if the BLIZZARD ERA data is equal to shared ERA among CORDEX EA team.
However, for next year, we plan to use GCM which is less likely to exist on BLIZZARD server.
Since our East ASIA project team have agreement that use same shared GCM data for simulation in different RCM s, I hope that I can convert shared GCM appropriately for CLM simulation.
Best reagrds
Lee Donghyun
Dear Dong Hyun,
would you please send me your e-Mail address.
I tried donghyunlee@postech.ac.kr
but it failed.
my E-Mail: hans-juergen.panitz@kit.edu
Hans-Juergen