INT2LM Climate grid decomposition failed – in #10: INT2LM
in #10: INT2LM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Dear colleagues, I have tested all working int2lm versions (2.04 and 2.05) for other domains without pole transection and, therefore, without ‘north_add_in=1,east_add_in=1,’ namelists. All these runs worked well. Therefore, I can conclude the problem is in the
<span class="caps">
GRID
</span>
_IN namelists, maybe specific for the int2lm 2.04 and 2.05 versions. However, this script worked well a feew months before. The other possible issue could be changes in the
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-I forcing data prepared on the
<span class="caps">
DKRZ
</span>
if any, because I have dowloaded them recently.
<br/>
So, if anybody could suggest any solutions or other sources of problem, or knows any useful information about the cited issues, I would be very grateful for any hints! Thank you very much!
</p>
<p>
Dear colleagues, I have tested all working int2lm versions (2.04 and 2.05) for other domains without pole transection and, therefore, without ‘north_add_in=1,east_add_in=1,’ namelists. All these runs worked well. Therefore, I can conclude the problem is in the
<span class="caps">
GRID
</span>
_IN namelists, maybe specific for the int2lm 2.04 and 2.05 versions. However, this script worked well a feew months before. The other possible issue could be changes in the
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-I forcing data prepared on the
<span class="caps">
DKRZ
</span>
if any, because I have dowloaded them recently.
<br/>
So, if anybody could suggest any solutions or other sources of problem, or knows any useful information about the cited issues, I would be very grateful for any hints! Thank you very much!
</p>
Dear colleagues, I have tested all working int2lm versions (2.04 and 2.05) for other domains without pole transection and, therefore, without ‘north_add_in=1,east_add_in=1,’ namelists. All these runs worked well. Therefore, I can conclude the problem is in the
GRID
_IN namelists, maybe specific for the int2lm 2.04 and 2.05 versions. However, this script worked well a feew months before. The other possible issue could be changes in the
ERA
-I forcing data prepared on the
DKRZ
if any, because I have dowloaded them recently.
So, if anybody could suggest any solutions or other sources of problem, or knows any useful information about the cited issues, I would be very grateful for any hints! Thank you very much!
Dear colleagues, I have tested all working int2lm versions (2.04 and 2.05) for other domains without pole transection and, therefore, without ‘north_add_in=1,east_add_in=1,’ namelists. All these runs worked well. Therefore, I can conclude the problem is in the GRID _IN namelists, maybe specific for the int2lm 2.04 and 2.05 versions. However, this script worked well a feew months before. The other possible issue could be changes in the ERA -I forcing data prepared on the DKRZ if any, because I have dowloaded them recently.
So, if anybody could suggest any solutions or other sources of problem, or knows any useful information about the cited issues, I would be very grateful for any hints! Thank you very much!