preparing ECHAM data for INT2LM – in #8: General Questions
in #8: General Questions
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Hey, I want to force my
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
simulation with output from the
<span class="caps">
ECHAM
</span>
model
<br/>
[ https://fesom.de/models/awi-cm/ ]
</p>
<p>
Has anyone experience concering the preprocessing [ECHAM output —-compatiblity—-> INT2LM input]
</p>
<p>
So far we have found that:
</p>
<p>
[T] 3D
<br/>
cdo -sp2gp echam6.nc output.nc
<br/>
transforms the spectral temperature to lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[U,V] 3D
<br/>
cdo -dv2uv echam6.nc output.nc
<br/>
transforms the spectral divergence/vorticity to u/v-winds on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[QV,QC,QI] 3D
<br/>
specific humidity, cloud water, cloud ice are already on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[W_SNOW, FR_LAND,T_SKIN,T_SNOW,FIS,PS,FR_SEA_ICE] 2D
<br/>
seem all to exist and are already on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[W_SO_REL,T_SO] 3D
<br/>
(multi layer) soil moisture content and soil temperature are difficult.
<br/>
We havn´t found the temperature, but a soil moisture content (in meter).
<br/>
Is is possible to run INT2LM with: lmulti_layer_lm=TRUE ; lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
<br/>
(If yes, is this a good idea?)
</p>
<p>
Any other advice or suggestion that comes to mind?
</p>
<p>
Cheers
<br/>
Rolf
</p>
<p>
Hey, I want to force my
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
simulation with output from the
<span class="caps">
ECHAM
</span>
model
<br/>
[ https://fesom.de/models/awi-cm/ ]
</p>
<p>
Has anyone experience concering the preprocessing [ECHAM output —-compatiblity—-> INT2LM input]
</p>
<p>
So far we have found that:
</p>
<p>
[T] 3D
<br/>
cdo -sp2gp echam6.nc output.nc
<br/>
transforms the spectral temperature to lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[U,V] 3D
<br/>
cdo -dv2uv echam6.nc output.nc
<br/>
transforms the spectral divergence/vorticity to u/v-winds on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[QV,QC,QI] 3D
<br/>
specific humidity, cloud water, cloud ice are already on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[W_SNOW, FR_LAND,T_SKIN,T_SNOW,FIS,PS,FR_SEA_ICE] 2D
<br/>
seem all to exist and are already on lat/lon grid
</p>
<p>
[W_SO_REL,T_SO] 3D
<br/>
(multi layer) soil moisture content and soil temperature are difficult.
<br/>
We havn´t found the temperature, but a soil moisture content (in meter).
<br/>
Is is possible to run INT2LM with: lmulti_layer_lm=TRUE ; lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
<br/>
(If yes, is this a good idea?)
</p>
<p>
Any other advice or suggestion that comes to mind?
</p>
<p>
Cheers
<br/>
Rolf
</p>
Hey, I want to force my
CCLM
simulation with output from the
ECHAM
model
[ https://fesom.de/models/awi-cm/ ]
Has anyone experience concering the preprocessing [ECHAM output —-compatiblity—-> INT2LM input]
So far we have found that:
[T] 3D
cdo -sp2gp echam6.nc output.nc
transforms the spectral temperature to lat/lon grid
[U,V] 3D
cdo -dv2uv echam6.nc output.nc
transforms the spectral divergence/vorticity to u/v-winds on lat/lon grid
[QV,QC,QI] 3D
specific humidity, cloud water, cloud ice are already on lat/lon grid
[W_SNOW, FR_LAND,T_SKIN,T_SNOW,FIS,PS,FR_SEA_ICE] 2D
seem all to exist and are already on lat/lon grid
[W_SO_REL,T_SO] 3D
(multi layer) soil moisture content and soil temperature are difficult.
We havn´t found the temperature, but a soil moisture content (in meter).
Is is possible to run INT2LM with: lmulti_layer_lm=TRUE ; lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
(If yes, is this a good idea?)
Any other advice or suggestion that comes to mind?
There is a very old version of a converter under https://redc.clm-community.eu/projects/int2lm/wiki/Pre-Processor_Programs
In the tape archive
/hpss/doku/ik0555/DKRZ_LTA_555_ds00001/cordex/MPI-ESM-LR
at
DKRZ
you find examples how the files should look like. Below is a “ncdump -h” listing as an example
T_SO is not needed for
COSMO
_CLM. INT2LM calculates an exponential profile using T_S or T_SKIN (or even T(ke) in the worst case, if the latter are not available).
W_SO_REL: I cannot remember if a conversion factor is needed. Anyway, you can also initialise with an artificial soil moisture by setting
in CONTRL
itype_w_so_rel = 0
and in LMGRID
czvw_so_lm= 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75,
Setting
lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
is probably not a good idea.
preparing ECHAM data for INT2LM
Hey, I want to force my CCLM simulation with output from the ECHAM model
[ https://fesom.de/models/awi-cm/ ]
Has anyone experience concering the preprocessing [ECHAM output —-compatiblity—-> INT2LM input]
So far we have found that:
[T] 3D
cdo -sp2gp echam6.nc output.nc
transforms the spectral temperature to lat/lon grid
[U,V] 3D
cdo -dv2uv echam6.nc output.nc
transforms the spectral divergence/vorticity to u/v-winds on lat/lon grid
[QV,QC,QI] 3D
specific humidity, cloud water, cloud ice are already on lat/lon grid
[W_SNOW, FR_LAND,T_SKIN,T_SNOW,FIS,PS,FR_SEA_ICE] 2D
seem all to exist and are already on lat/lon grid
[W_SO_REL,T_SO] 3D
(multi layer) soil moisture content and soil temperature are difficult.
We havn´t found the temperature, but a soil moisture content (in meter).
Is is possible to run INT2LM with: lmulti_layer_lm=TRUE ; lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
(If yes, is this a good idea?)
Any other advice or suggestion that comes to mind?
Cheers
Rolf
There is a very old version of a converter under https://redc.clm-community.eu/projects/int2lm/wiki/Pre-Processor_Programs
In the tape archive
/hpss/doku/ik0555/DKRZ_LTA_555_ds00001/cordex/MPI-ESM-LR
at DKRZ you find examples how the files should look like. Below is a “ncdump -h” listing as an exampleT_SO is not needed for COSMO _CLM. INT2LM calculates an exponential profile using T_S or T_SKIN (or even T(ke) in the worst case, if the latter are not available).
W_SO_REL: I cannot remember if a conversion factor is needed. Anyway, you can also initialise with an artificial soil moisture by setting
in CONTRL
itype_w_so_rel = 0
and in LMGRID
czvw_so_lm= 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75,
Setting
lmulti_layer_in=FALSE
is probably not a good idea.