Wrong LHFL_S calculation in the case of sublimation – in #9: CCLM
in #9: CCLM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
If I am not completely wrong the effect should be an increase of the latent heat flux over the “frozen/icy” surfaces
<br/>
by about 13% (0.13 =lh_f/lh_v= 0.33E6/2.5E6). Correct?
</p>
<p>
Hans-Jürgen
</p>
<p>
If I am not completely wrong the effect should be an increase of the latent heat flux over the “frozen/icy” surfaces
<br/>
by about 13% (0.13 =lh_f/lh_v= 0.33E6/2.5E6). Correct?
</p>
<p>
Hans-Jürgen
</p>
If I am not completely wrong the effect should be an increase of the latent heat flux over the “frozen/icy” surfaces
by about 13% (0.13 =lh_f/lh_v= 0.33E6/2.5E6). Correct?
If I am not completely wrong the effect should be an increase of the latent heat flux over the “frozen/icy” surfaces
by about 13% (0.13 =lh_f/lh_v= 0.33E6/2.5E6). Correct?
Hans-Jürgen