Wrong LHFL_S calculation in the case of sublimation – in #9: CCLM
in #9: CCLM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Hi Stefan,
</p>
<p>
thanks for this info, since I am using a separate sea-ice module, I haven’t noticed this error in the code. But you are absolutely right.
</p>
<p>
But I think in case of lake/sea-ice the latent heat of vapourisation and of fusion needs to be added (if I am not missing the fact that lh_v is somewhere integrated in qvsflx or lhfl_s already, then ignore this comment):
</p>
<p>
<code>
lhfl_s(i,j) = lhfl_s(i,j) + (lh_f+lh_v) * qvsflx(i,j)
</code>
</p>
<p>
at least this is what I am using in the separate sea-ice module.
</p>
<p>
Hi Stefan,
</p>
<p>
thanks for this info, since I am using a separate sea-ice module, I haven’t noticed this error in the code. But you are absolutely right.
</p>
<p>
But I think in case of lake/sea-ice the latent heat of vapourisation and of fusion needs to be added (if I am not missing the fact that lh_v is somewhere integrated in qvsflx or lhfl_s already, then ignore this comment):
</p>
<p>
<code>
lhfl_s(i,j) = lhfl_s(i,j) + (lh_f+lh_v) * qvsflx(i,j)
</code>
</p>
<p>
at least this is what I am using in the separate sea-ice module.
</p>
thanks for this info, since I am using a separate sea-ice module, I haven’t noticed this error in the code. But you are absolutely right.
But I think in case of lake/sea-ice the latent heat of vapourisation and of fusion needs to be added (if I am not missing the fact that lh_v is somewhere integrated in qvsflx or lhfl_s already, then ignore this comment):
Hi Stefan,
thanks for this info, since I am using a separate sea-ice module, I haven’t noticed this error in the code. But you are absolutely right.
But I think in case of lake/sea-ice the latent heat of vapourisation and of fusion needs to be added (if I am not missing the fact that lh_v is somewhere integrated in qvsflx or lhfl_s already, then ignore this comment):
lhfl_s(i,j) = lhfl_s(i,j) + (lh_f+lh_v) * qvsflx(i,j)at least this is what I am using in the separate sea-ice module.