Model initialization from ERA-Interim data: what happens with soil temperature? – in #10: INT2LM
in #10: INT2LM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer!
</p>
<p>
1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding
<span class="caps">
LAF
</span>
-file before running
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
?
<br/>
2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”?
</p>
<p>
Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer!
</p>
<p>
1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding
<span class="caps">
LAF
</span>
-file before running
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
?
<br/>
2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”?
</p>
1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding
LAF
-file before running
CCLM
?
2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”?
Dear Burkhardt, thank you for the answer!
1) In this case, are there any possibility to use T_SO from reanalysis? Or it will be simpler to correct corresponding LAF -file before running CCLM ?
2) If soil water content is taken from reanalysis, why I have message that “variable 34 W_SO not needed for boundary fields”?