Running CCLM with T_S from reanalysis? – in #9: CCLM
in #9: CCLM
Cookies disclaimer
Our site saves small pieces of text information (cookies) on your
device in order to verify your login. These cookies are essential
to provide access to resources on this website and it will not
work properly without.
Learn more
<p>
Dear colleges,
</p>
<p>
I would like to ask you, are there any possibility to run
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
model with temperature at lower boundary conditions, taken from reanalysis (
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-Interim in my case) not only for water cells, but also for the surface?
</p>
<p>
I’ve tried to run model with lsoil=F, but model fails with NaN values after one day.
</p>
<p>
Dear colleges,
</p>
<p>
I would like to ask you, are there any possibility to run
<span class="caps">
CCLM
</span>
model with temperature at lower boundary conditions, taken from reanalysis (
<span class="caps">
ERA
</span>
-Interim in my case) not only for water cells, but also for the surface?
</p>
<p>
I’ve tried to run model with lsoil=F, but model fails with NaN values after one day.
</p>
I would like to ask you, are there any possibility to run
CCLM
model with temperature at lower boundary conditions, taken from reanalysis (
ERA
-Interim in my case) not only for water cells, but also for the surface?
I’ve tried to run model with lsoil=F, but model fails with NaN values after one day.
<p>
I am afraid this may not work easily. I also tried lsoil=F some time ago and the model crashed. You probably have to dig into the source code for that.
</p>
<p>
I am afraid this may not work easily. I also tried lsoil=F some time ago and the model crashed. You probably have to dig into the source code for that.
</p>
I am afraid this may not work easily. I also tried lsoil=F some time ago and the model crashed. You probably have to dig into the source code for that.
<p>
Hi,
<br/>
in idealized mode (initial and boundary data are created within the model and
<br/>
do not come from external files) lsoil=.false. perfectly works. So
<br/>
I do not think that it is a fundamental problem, but maybe some small
<br/>
issue with the treatment of initial- and/or boundary data in the model.
<br/>
Maybe t_s is not initialized properly on both time levels.
</p>
<p>
Hi,
<br/>
in idealized mode (initial and boundary data are created within the model and
<br/>
do not come from external files) lsoil=.false. perfectly works. So
<br/>
I do not think that it is a fundamental problem, but maybe some small
<br/>
issue with the treatment of initial- and/or boundary data in the model.
<br/>
Maybe t_s is not initialized properly on both time levels.
</p>
Hi,
in idealized mode (initial and boundary data are created within the model and
do not come from external files) lsoil=.false. perfectly works. So
I do not think that it is a fundamental problem, but maybe some small
issue with the treatment of initial- and/or boundary data in the model.
Maybe t_s is not initialized properly on both time levels.
Running CCLM with T_S from reanalysis?
Dear colleges,
I would like to ask you, are there any possibility to run CCLM model with temperature at lower boundary conditions, taken from reanalysis ( ERA -Interim in my case) not only for water cells, but also for the surface?
I’ve tried to run model with lsoil=F, but model fails with NaN values after one day.
I am afraid this may not work easily. I also tried lsoil=F some time ago and the model crashed. You probably have to dig into the source code for that.
Hi,
in idealized mode (initial and boundary data are created within the model and
do not come from external files) lsoil=.false. perfectly works. So
I do not think that it is a fundamental problem, but maybe some small
issue with the treatment of initial- and/or boundary data in the model.
Maybe t_s is not initialized properly on both time levels.